Posts: 146
	Threads: 24
	Joined: Nov 2003
	
	
 
	
	
		Well because I spontaniously bought the Urusei Yatsura R1 (USA)box set on laserdisc it didnt cost me that much, like $66 total, less than 1/4 what buying the same thing on dvd would. I ordered a cheap player off of ebay and plan to do a Dvd conversion with my Dvd recorder. I noticed laserdisc were very cheap on ebay, and ordered a wide variety of them, movies, and anime alike, because I know ill be able to hook it up to my Dvd recorder for a quick conversion. Do you think this was wise, yes or no?
![[Image: uru44.JPG]](http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2003-2/110498/uru44.JPG) 
	
aka EngrishMajor
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 1,093
	Threads: 16
	Joined: Aug 2003
	
	
 
	
	
		Er no... Would be easyer to convert divx/xvid rips to dvd-r than laser disc... Be better quality aswell. Although having an LD player is cool.
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 146
	Threads: 24
	Joined: Nov 2003
	
	
 
	
		
		
		10-23-2005, 04:22 PM 
(This post was last modified: 10-23-2005, 04:29 PM by Liete.)
		
	 
	
		This set has a t-shirt, an art book, illustrations and all kinda of extra stuff with it. The auction said it had better video quality than the current dvd releases, since they are just transfers from the LD anyway. 
It wouldnt really be that hard either, I just run the AV cables from the LD player to the input on the Dvd player, then it to the tv, and push record.
	
	
	
aka EngrishMajor
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 2,243
	Threads: 124
	Joined: Jul 2019
	
	
 
	
	
		i personally wouldn't burn them to Dvd as you will loose quality since DVD are compressed using mpeg2. and even LD are not compressed at all . (hence why such large discs)
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 1,439
	Threads: 69
	Joined: Oct 2004
	
	
 
	
	
		Schultz Wrote:i personally wouldn't burn them to Dvd as you will loose quality since DVD are compressed using mpeg2. and even LD are not compressed at all . (hence why such large discs)
So LD has better quality? They are huge though so I guess it makes sense. I didn?t even know you could get them anymore. I've only seen a few of them in my life, and it has been so long since I watched one I could even remember what it was I watched, much less how it looked.
	
 
	
	
 ![[Image: kakashianbubanner3psdva9.jpg]](http://img213.imageshack.us/img213/3944/kakashianbubanner3psdva9.jpg) "OMFG, let me rush onto my NOAHS ARC!" by JunkieJoe
 
"OMFG, let me rush onto my NOAHS ARC!" by JunkieJoe
 
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 1,093
	Threads: 16
	Joined: Aug 2003
	
	
 
	
	
		Blight Wrote:So LD has better quality?
Rarely as LD's are analog and not digital.
	
 
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 146
	Threads: 24
	Joined: Nov 2003
	
	
 
	
		
		
		10-24-2005, 09:20 AM 
(This post was last modified: 10-24-2005, 09:32 AM by Liete.)
		
	 
	
		Die hard LD fans will tell you analog is capable of cleaner and higher quality video because digital video compresses the video, which causes the well known artifacts and motion blur.
LaserDisc, pixelation and motion blur is COMPLETELY non-existant because it does not use digital video, however the picture is not quite as sharp or vibrant because it does not use digital enhancement.
LD died before digital filtering became largely possible in analog video, some of the last LD's which had analog video digitally filtered completely SPANKED there dvd counterparts.
![[Image: starwars1.JPG]](http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2003-2/110498/starwars1.JPG) 
	
aka EngrishMajor